Fürst after the battle as a general

So, dear Václav, like this:

1. By early 2020, I wouldn't throw all pandemic plans out the window andhe didn't get firedchief hygienist. Throwing away the general and all the plans right before the battle is a trivial mistake that I would not make.

2. Long before the epidemic, I would have read smart books about history and those guys from the intelligence service who would come to the crisis staff to hang balls up my nose, so I would believe every fifth word. I was already told before the epidemic: about the assassination of JFK, about 9/11, about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq...

3. I would have recognized that Marián Hajdúch totally s***ed the Preval study, so I would have understood already in the spring of 2020 that this whole group does not know what they are talking about, and listening to them will lead us to hell. I would readIoannidiseaA short one. I would blacklist Hajdúch and the rest of the professors, doctors and associate professors signed on to Preval ("do not give any grants") and do the seroprevalence study again andproperly.

4. I would read on wikipedia what the sensitivity and specificity of the test are and I would immediately stop PCR testing healthy people because I would understand thatwe will drown hopelesslyin a sea of ​​false positives. I would not start testing at all until I have measured the sensitivity and specificity of all the tests used (PCR, all possible antigens, ...). Every month I would do one round of blind round-robin testing of all labs and ruthlessly stop paying the ones that don't meet the standard. I would just stupidly take over the laboratory accreditation system. I would readPrince, and noWorse.

5. I wouldn't allow the language we use to talk about the epidemic to become cold, because that is always the first step towards totality. The sick person is the one who has symptoms, and not the one to whom some Chinese piece of paper shows a false positive result (whatever it isWHO thinks, what he wants). A vaccine is a substance that protects against a specific disease, not some preparation that "it does something with immunity"(be about itThe CDC sayswhatever he wants).Non-infectiousnessthere is no record of vaccinations or a negative test result. I would use these words correctly on every piece of paper, and I would disrespectfully jump into the mouth of any journalistic hyena who would bend their language to suit their agenda.

6. Before I proceed to variousupperadvice that I should close schools, shops, theaters or factories, so I would try it in small pilot studies. He thinkssome professorthat closing schools is a good idea? OK, let's pick one big high school in one county town that has two parallels in each year. We send one class home and let the other go to school. In 14 days it will be clear if it has any effect on the spread of the infection.

7. I would demand the same small, quick, cheap studies for every idea anyone comes up with: Face masks, lockdowns, school rotations, spacing, and so on and so forth. For any such measure, I would understand that it is many orders of magnitude cheaper to try it first on a small scale than to rush the whole republic into it right away and then argue for years whether it helped or harmed. I would have more self-confidence and copy German ideas less. In God we trust, everyone else brings data.

8. The only precaution I would be willing to state across the board would be "Please don't go around sick people". I would easily simplify the sick pay temporarily - those who are sick stay at home with full pay. Before people started abusing it, the wave would be gone and I'd cancel it again.

9. If someone brought me some kind of mathematical model, I'd chase it out of Strakovka, because I knowhow much damage to the worldthese charlatans have already done it with the computer. If they didn't give me a break, I would gain weighta few people who understand it, to contrast the models.

10. I'd keep the soldiers as far away from my body as possible and I'd be highly suspicious if they wanted mepermission to collectdata on telephone calls or payment cards of all residents. If a ministerpassed the proceedingsof my department to a rogue colonel, I would fire him immediately.

11. I would stop the pointless tracing the moment there was community spread of the disease.

12. I would explain to Dušek at ÚZIS that they are paid to collect data as best as possible and publish it in an anonymized form, and not tothey played with models, which they do not understand. If he didn't get it, I would change him.

13. I would immediately take action against censorship. I would like to remind everyone that init is written in the constitution, that censorship is inadmissible, and that extinguishes it. I would throw the fraudsters from Semantic Vision and other well-rounded fact-checkers out the door with a loud roar. I would make sure that I have a relevant opponent for each recommendation. Groupthink is bullshit.

14. I would not allow doctors to close their offices and let them be creative in their treatment. Let them try anything that might work against covid, and I would support free and open discussion. I would easily pay them from the state coffers a free discussion forum and promise an extraordinary financial reward to anyone who comes up with a protocol that cures covid (it was enoughlook abroad). And if the doctors at the head of self-governing and professional societies had complete idiots who would sabotage all this, I would promise that after the end of the epidemic I would change the law so that the exercise of the medical profession would be as free as possible. I would understand that vaccine manufacturers must not allow a "covid cure" to appear at any cost (according to American law, they would then not be able to get Emergency Use Authorization for their vaccines). But I'd guess that's their problem, not mine.

15. In HořejšíhoFundamentals of immunologyI would especially study the chapters on immune memory and mucosal immunity. At several pilot workplaces, I would have the immunity of people who have already experienced covid monitored. By carefully analyzing the data, I would already at the end of 2020found out, that the immunity of convalescents is very strong, reinfections come only after a long time and are always milder than the first disease, so I don't have to bother convalescents with vaccinations and other measures.

16. At least I would read it, what I'm signing in the contract with Fujzr regarding "vaccines" because I know I'm dealing with a bunch of first class charlatans who have already paid billions of dollars in fines for defrauding customers.

17. From each batch of "vaccine" delivered to the Republic, I would randomly select a few vials and have them measured in two accredited laboratories. If the results did not match, I would have them remeasured by a third laboratory. I would get advice on testing from someone,who understands it. If the labs found an ingredient that has nothing to do with the "vaccine", I would immediately stop the vaccination.

18. I would instruct SÚKL to carefully monitor the number of reported suspected adverse effects of new "vaccines". I would remind the doctors thatthey have an obligationto report all suspicions and I would introduce a reimbursement code for reporting so they don't talk about it keeping them from work. I would order an autopsy on anyone under 70 who died within a month of any dose of the covid "vaccine".

19. Every month I would evaluate this data and sometime around March 2021 I would stop vaccination against covid across the board because I would find that all the lights in the pharmacovigilance systems are flashing red. I wouldn't expect it in four yearsa US Senate investigation will confirm.

20. I would be much more cautious about covid "vaccines" than regular vaccinations. I would not recommend vaccination during epidemic waves, I would not vaccinate those who have experienced covid. I would read the "vaccine" registration studies (or ask inSMIS, where isthey can readathey understandthat) and I would declare in a raised voice that I will not let myself be made a fool of. I wouldn't even think of getting close to pregnant women or children with the vaccineNEJM writes, what he wants). I would advise adults to consult their doctor before vaccination. In no case would I consider mandatory vaccination of any population group.

21. I would consistently combat conflicts of interest. I wouldn't allow itpeople connectedwith the exclusive importer of vaccines to talk to vaccination. I wouldn't allow itto people who make money from PCR testingto whateverthey talkedto testing.

And on the day of the five-year anniversary of the beginning of the epidemic, I would establish the Institute for the Investigation of the Crimes of Covidism and I would instruct it to begin to unravel what and why actually happened in cooperation with similar organizations abroad. By special law, I would grant him extensive powers of access to data and the ability to subpoena and cross-examine witnesses.

So he didn't actually start it. Because if my team and I were running it - according to the above principles - we would have far fewer covid deaths, we wouldn't have tens of thousands of people damaged by "vaccines", we wouldn't have disorganized education, healthcare and the economy, and we wouldn't have a latent civil war in society.

Only the most quoted professor of immunology would make a fuss about me being a murderer in the media. But no one would listen to him because we would have the fewest deaths per population in Europe.