Covid19, akcie, vlády a vyšetřování ⁉️ Wolfgang Wodarg (2 část) 2026

You get extra money for the Covid test >> and hospitals received extra funding; they got € 100 more per day in the intensive care unit if it was a Covid patient. >> That is why they looked for Covid everywhere. >> In the winter of 2020, there was no more influenza. There were 5 million Covid cases and only 1,200 influenza cases. Usually, it was the other way around. There was no flu. The flu ceased to exist. For 5 million so-called Covid infections, there were 1,200 cases of flu. Previously, it was the opposite. >> You only find what you look for. That means you always find exactly what you are looking for. And for Covid-19, the WHO created that. There were three different types of cases. Germany. That means the doctor who doesn't report it. And the first case was someone who had symptoms like a cold, that is, like the flu. Laboratory confirmation, that means a PCR test for Covid. PCR, >> that was a clinically and laboratory-confirmed case. However, it must be said that the clinical symptoms could certainly have been caused by something else, yet the test was still positive. So you can have both lice and fleas simultaneously. A person can have both, so a positive Covid test does not mean the flu is Covid. There are over 200 different viruses that can cause the same symptoms, that can cause such flu-like symptoms. >> And you only find what you are looking for. There are maybe for 20 such types, there is a multiplex test, but those were not used. Then there was a second case that was reportable, which was someone whose test was positive, but who was healthy. The next case, which was counted as Covid, was a positive test, but otherwise, they were clinically completely healthy. Carrier. And then there was a third case, >> who also had the flu, who had symptoms, >> but the test was negative, right? >> But they had contact with someone whose test was positive. The whole diagnosis was just patched together, that all diagnostics of this infection end only with that, and what one learns, the differential diagnosis of a disease, was totally denied and forgotten. What we learn as doctors regarding the differential diagnosis of a disease was totally forgotten or discarded. Yes, that is how the pandemic was produced, >> and the companies were suddenly allowed to genetically modify humans. And on the stock market, this had corresponding successes for the firms; they did a lot of advertising for this new technology and raised funds. technology, and that subsequently happened again with the bird flu 2 virus. Then later they tried it again with the so-called bird flu two. Then came the Hantavirus, then came mpox. Every time, the stock prices of companies with a vaccine in the pipeline went up. I made fun of that, >> because regarding the bird flu, they were testing cow udders with PCR tests and diagnosing bird flu there. Even the mouse in the barn was positive and had bird flu, and the cat too, and then the milker afterwards; he had wiped his eyes after milking, and he had conjunctivitis, and the test was positive for bird flu. H5N1. The confirmation that these really were these dangerous viruses was only allowed to be done in high-security labs. There were only two in the USA, and they were under military supervision. Of the highest security level. The American government had promised the company Moderna, which developed an RNA vaccine against bird flu H5N1, over 700 million dollars as aid for the development of this vaccine . RNA. Vaccine against bird flu, 700 million. I made fun of that, I called it the bird-cow-cat-mouse-milker flu. I'm not making this up. I call it that myself, it's the bird, mouse, cat, and milker flu, and I laughed about it. >> It was ridiculous. >> And Trump then withdrew the money, he didn't pay it, he said, okay, we're not paying that. But they had already made a lot of stock market gains beforehand. And initially. 700 million. I don't know if Trump had shares too, I don't know. But then, when it came out, when they were being laughed at and the money was withdrawn, Moderna's stock fell very sharply. And because they were mocked, the Moderna stock fell all the way back down. Buy cheap and... >> It was reported that there were suddenly three deaths on a luxury ship from Hantavirus. And then came the news in the media that three dead were discovered on a luxury ship from Hantavirus infection. >> And the American army, the researchers there who do this biological research for the American army, they published a paper together with an Argentine lab in 2020 that Hantaviruses can spread from person to person. The American army, together with an Argentine laboratory, published as early as 2020 that Hantavirus is transmitted from person to person. Previously, that was not known. And then there was a paper by other South American researchers—not just in Argentina, but from all over America—who did a review, which was funded by the Pan American Health Organization. ...financed by the American health organization, they investigated it. It was a very good study. They gathered everything known, including that study from the military which claimed it was dangerous and that there were Hantavirus superspreaders. They evaluated that study as well, and said that for all the documents available, there is no evidence whatsoever that these viruses can be transmitted from person to person. They published that in 2022, two years later . After two years, they finally gathered that it was impossible to prove that it transmits from person to person. But the Robert Koch Institute only took the first paper, the fear-mongering one. >> And then, when was it, in early May, they told all health departments that anyone who had contact with someone on that ship, where the Hantaviruses were supposedly present, had to go into quarantine for six weeks. And that is why there were measures stating that anyone who had any contact with a person who was on that ship, where the virus appeared, had to go into quarantine for weeks. And the Robert Koch Institute actually knew that this second study existed. Even though the Robert Koch Institute scientists knew full well it wasn't transmitted and they knew about the second study, they just concealed it during those roughly 10 days from the first report that three people had died of Hantavirus on that luxury liner. >> Died? >> Yes, three people died. Not on the ship , but afterwards on land, they died. So those three from the ship actually died , and 10 days after it was reported. They changed course. That means you could have bought Moderna stock cheaply after the money—after Trump took the money away—and then when Hantavirus came, you would have earned an incredible amount if you already knew about it beforehand. >> In other words, anyone who knew exactly how it would be handled earned an immense amount of money, because it is still the same stock. After those dealings with Trump, with the 700 million being pulled back, the stock is worth nothing. Someone buys it, Hantavirus emerges, and a 25%gain is guaranteed. Whoever knows this earns immense money on the stock market. >> A wave of fear is created, the price rises, and those who know this—those who know these things on the stock exchange—that is insider trading. The WHO helps with that. The WHO is an agency for the preparation and facilitation of insider trading. These dealings—these insider trades—mean it's those who are in the know. The WHO is most involved in that. The WHO is practically an organization today that helps people know that these panics and these fears will spread, and thanks to that, the stocks move. financing. private money, which it receives, they financed. matters, among the biggest investors are the Melinda Gateses, and also every time the stocks come beforehand. One of the biggest investors is, of course, the Gates Foundation, and he always knows in advance what is going to happen on the stock market. producing vaccines only to ride the stock market. Then comes the next wave of fear. Monkeypox. There was a gay party in France, and they all suddenly had—they were all vaccinated , they had already gotten shots against Covid, and there were many with herpes zoster and other...a pair of homosexuals, they got Covid and received. known side effects. in. >> and suddenly they were tested for monkeypox with PCR tests. PCR testing. I found that very discriminatory. >> Strange that they tested these people in France for monkeypox using PCR. PCR testing. Strange how one searches on a luxury liner for viruses—searches for Hantavirus, which otherwise only exists on garbage dumps. Hantavirus on a luxury ocean liner. Those are, in fact, hantaviruses. They are, in fact, viruses that otherwise only occur in dumpsites. So, where it is dirty and where there is mouse or rat droppings, that is where there is. aerosol, >> but not on a luxury liner, where everything is nice and clean and all. >> I said back then that when the ship reaches the first port, one should look very specifically at the ventilation systems themselves to see if these viruses can be found anywhere in one of those ventilation ducts. That is why I said, when they dock at some port, what they can meaningfully do is inspect all the air, the ventilation technology; where the air is led through the ship, they could be present there. So these inhaled pathogens, one can very easily apply them to people if one wants, via the ventilation system. If one really wanted to apply these to people, to spread them, then the best way is through the ventilation system. Or could one have simply done it even in individual cabins in a targeted way? That is, in my opinion, the only possibility of how these cases could have come about. Yes, so one makes people sick on purpose, one creates fear, and with monkeypox, it was exactly the same. It was the PCR test and the pimples that they had. I did a quiz where I had seven pictures today. it is simply fear today, smallpox. monkeypox, and one picture was. Herpes labialis, then Herpes genitalis, Herpes zoster, Pemphigus vulgaris, chickenpox. According to the pustular disease. skin symptoms, herpes zoster, genital herpes , labial herpes, herpes zoster or pemphigus, which means pus on the skin. And then I asked, which of these is monkeypox >> and then they should check on my homepage, that's where the resolution is naturally, I wanted them all to go to my homepage. >> Yes. And there it was, these are all pox if the PCR test is positive. That's how it was with COVID-19 too, anyone who coughed and had a positive PCR test you can see how absurd the whole thing is, but that those who should know better participated in it, that is what scares me. >> all of this was immensely absurd, but it is bad that doctors participated in it, and that makes me afraid. Yes, we appreciate this professional lecture. I believe it will reach Czech and Slovak doctors. But I will ask about how you mentioned the military's role in the whole implementation of this widespread fear. Well, we can say with certainty today that in the Czech Republic we have the same Minister of Health and the same Prime Minister who bought vaccines, launched the vaccination campaign, and all that pressure campaign on the citizens of the Czech Republic. Prime Minister these same regime. We can also say that, in fact, in the Czech Republic, the military was based on the third floor of the Ministry of Health and participated in management through smart quarantine and other activities. Let's leave that for a moment because in the Czech Republic there is complete darkness, complete silence about covid. >> But we are following events abroad, in Germany. How do you perceive the investigation or the situation regarding the political reflection of these events today. Yes, where the impact is greatest, that is naturally where it is discussed the most and there is political pressure, and some parties have taken up this topic and have also attracted many voters with it . They are actually gaining voters, because there are many victims and many who have suffered from it, and where there is greater political pressure, something is also happening there. Polarization not only among the population, whether one is afraid or not afraid, but it also leads to party-political polarization, to the point where the ruling parties even want to ban the parties that advocate for it. They want something like this to be investigated, and they are trying to ban the other parties that are fighting for a process of finding out what actually happened. The arguments one hears there are very misleading because right and left are always being mixed up. The arguments we hear are terribly misleading, because we keep hearing about the right and the left. So someone who censors and uses fascist methods like deprivation of liberty, they are then left-wing >> And anyone who wants to investigate and stands up for those affected by this action is then automatically right-wing , regardless of whether they have a socialist background or not. I, for example, was deputy parliamentary group leader of the socialists in the European Parliamentary Assembly. Those people today who want it to be investigated, who want to do something for the victims, are automatically labeled right-wingers. I myself was chairman of the health committee in the regional parliament for the socialists. With the Democrats, I was branded as being from the left wing. I was part of the radical left within the Social Democrats. With Covid, I was suddenly right-wing. >> Yes. And so, I no longer know where right and left are. >> When driving a car, it still works. >> Yes, that is, we are being totally confused. I therefore made a proposal. It is terribly and constantly confusing us again and again. At an event in Berlin, I suggested that there should be an inter-factional initiative for members of parliament to introduce a motion in the Bundestag—you can do this in the state parliament too—to change the seating arrangement and introduce an alphabetical seating order . I suggested that, as part of changes to political voting and political work in general, the factions and even the seating order in parliament should be abolished, not based on factions and parties, but alphabetically. There is no left and right anymore. There are only individual representatives. >> And I am someone who says anyway that parties were invented to make democracy manageable for other powerful people in the background, so that they can direct the entire policy much more easily through the parties than if there were no parties, but only many individual representatives. I have been saying for a long time that political parties exist primarily so that the truly rich and powerful in the background can control democracy. The proposal was to make every vote a roll-call vote, meaning an electronic voting procedure is used so you can see every time who participated, who voted, and how they voted. It should, of course, be individual and totally transparent. Every "yes" or "no" vote must be precisely identified as to who it was and how they voted. So I think the person who sent the politician there, meaning the public, has a right to know everything. Just imagine the media and how difficult that will be for them! They can no longer divide things into right and left and say, "The one party. " They will have to deal with the content of all the individual representatives. Imagine how terrible that would be for the media, with no left or right wing; they would have to focus on every individual representative and finally move on to the actual content of politics. I can still imagine that we have directly elected representatives. >> Who are chosen directly by the people, who can introduce themselves anywhere, but are not nominated by parties—so they are not party nominees, but present themselves to their voters, fight for votes themselves, and can be recalled by 10%of the electorate. Then a new election must be held, for example, 10%. They are recalled, so they can be recalled at any time. That would mean there would be no more elections, no more election campaigns. People in a constituency can always ensure that the right person represents them in parliament and can change that at any time. So there are no more legislative periods. No parliamentary groups, and the representatives have to come together on a topic-by-topic basis and fight for the things they find important. You could start this, though it is very difficult to start at the federal level. But you can also start in smaller regions or smaller parliaments. 80 million is national. Parliament sets its own rules for everything. The parliament gives itself its own rules, they themselves set the rules of procedure in parliament. It is the parliament itself; they decide their own rules of procedure. So they have to say: "We want to do it this way in the future." And I believe there are many people who would support that. >> A wonderful vision. I am very glad for this, because after two years of engagement in the office of the Czech government, and being close to seeing how the lobbyist environment influences not only individual people from the parties, but the entire government, dictating its rules, such visions and innovations are extremely important for us to discuss as a systemic change for the future, because, to follow up on that, I see not only decentralization and regionalization. >> but also the mentioned greater transparency, >> where I can suddenly see, for example —just as an example—on a mobile app , how my representative or the person I voted for voted, in real-time that very day, without the intermediary of a political party, without the intermediary of the media, and without other manipulations as it functions today. It seems like a set of small things, >> But when you imagine that a government, like the Czech government, as is known, decides for 10 million people from one day to the next, proposing something— they call it slangily "a bedtime story" —handing out papers, distributing what they are voting on, asking no one, raising their hands, and things either happen or don't, and suddenly we would be able to see their cards. Suddenly, everything would be exposed as open data, meaning publicly available in some government application and so on and so forth. So, I would be interested in doing a workshop on similar things in the future. And I think the Czech Republic would be a suitable laboratory in the future to come up with new free elections and a new concept for elections to the Parliament of the Czech Republic. Geez. At the university , I once had my students work on the topic of lobbying. >> And they looked it up on the internet, what these lobby firms are—it is an entire industry, a huge industry. They tell their clients, "We will ensure that your goals are pushed through in politics." These firms, the big ones, like Burson with 6,000 employees, Edelman with 6,000 employees, they are full of psychologists, highly paid scientists, lawyers, so these are... Firms, law, you can hire them, and they offer, for example, to monitor members of parliament. They provide a precise profile for every member of parliament who is important to the client, who creates legislation that could be decisive for the operation or for the company that is sponsoring or employing this firm. If you have enough money, you hire such a firm, and they will give you a precise monitoring of every single member of parliament: how you should approach them, how you should influence them so that they defend your interests—or rather, the interests of the client of these lobbying firms. These observations are made by former intelligence agents—specialists who know how to do it—who create profiles and actually know how to...And then they can find out: What can you use to lure them? What do they like to do? Can you court them somehow, or can you do them a favor? I’ll just call it corrupting. >> Yes. >> Making them look important, making them look important in public too. With what pardon, that...How can we influence him in a positive sense? What does he respond to, what does he like, what does he enjoy doing, how can we lift him up, how can we give him a better career, or you find out if he has evaded taxes, cheated on his wife, or done something else bad, then you can go to the other......to that other track, eh, whether he perhaps evaded taxes, was unfaithful to his wife, or what other ugly thing he did, so as to blackmail him. So you have these two possibilities: either push them up positively or destroy someone publicly. Yes, >> And then there is the close, the close cooperation with the major media, who promise: if you, if you give us your things, we will bring them to the market, we will get your things out to the population, we have the best connections in the editorial offices of the major newspapers and television. Editorial offices of newspapers and television. They know how to help each other, the media is supposed to get their topics out to the people, they help with that; there are companies that specialize in polishing up a corporation that has done something bad before. Greenwashing. >> Greenwashing, you can buy that. >> Well, and then they are always invited, there is good food, and then there are clubs. And then, you probably know these Young Shapers, the Global Young Shapers and the Global Young Leaders, who—you have probably heard of them —are, that is done by Davos, by the rich people in Davos, and by sponsors, by billionaires; they set up schools where they meet, congresses are held where they get to know each other early on and are prepared for leading positions in this corrupt structure in politics or even in large international organizations. >> Global Young Leaders, those are the future bosses of everything possible. Billionaires pick them out while they are still students, they finance it, Davos organizes it. These people are invited, they have shared experiences together, to be prepared for their future tasks. Socialism, re-education, socialism, that was called a cadre school. Exactly: They raise their own people, see who plays along, who we can control well, and that person then becomes president, controlling, reaching the top, best via the party; you can see them becoming important in the party right away. >> Government, opposition party. They have to rise quickly within their own party. Those are the right ones. The top, they always play on both sides. That is something that is very successful, because when you want to bribe, when you want corruption, it is cheapest and most efficient to bribe the boss. It is very, very effective, because it is clear that if you want to practice corruption, it is the most efficient and at the same time cheapest way to corrupt the boss. It is much too tedious to bribe the many civil servants. And if you do it like they did in France, like the Rothschilds, who at the time supported the founding of the En Marche party, >> and then lifted a young, dynamic candidate onto the tray. A candidate whom no one knew before. He was then really pushed by bought media, by media conglomerates, >> and suddenly he was the French head of government. >> Not with Le Pen, not with the right, with the left, with the liberals. Suddenly, there was someone marching who nobody knew before. En marche. >> Yeah. >> Suddenly, there was someone there in France whom no one had ever seen before . >> Yes, the French president. >> The French president. >> Yes. And Germany now has someone who was very successful at BlackRock. >> Germany now has a manager who was previously supported by BlackRock for many years. That is the current chancellor. So, steps are being taken here to ensure that the people at the top of the government are those you can do anything with. And that worked with Covid, with this fear-mongering and, yes, where our freedoms were taken away , where we were conditioned to obey, to be afraid, and then to obey. It worked wonderfully. All the presidents across the globe played along. And whoever didn't play along was allowed to protect their population. Like the Swedes, like the Russians, like them and many others, the Chinese. For the Chinese, on March 1st......the pandemic was over. That was just a reminder, it perfectly showed how this works. Back then, the fear and panic were created by everyone at the top, the presidents, the heads of government, the entire establishment. Whoever listened the most did the best job. And if there was someone there who didn't do it completely or didn't want to, they were spared. Sweden, Russia, China. In China , the Covid pandemic was......over on March 1st, 2020. Yes, you can see that this was really something that had been practiced beforehand, agreed upon, and prepared over years and decades. SARS 1 , the bird flu, then the swine flu, then a little Ebola in between. That went a little, it went a bit differently. There were several other small things where they just wanted to do a favor for a pharmaceutical company and stir things up a bit on the stock market again. There were lots of different preparations, just as we have talked about here. Bird flu, swine flu, Ebola, SARS 1, MERS, and all those were preparations for this campaign that truly launched in 2020. Jan Ámos Komenský, silver medal, commemorative coin sold out. "Where is my home," the great symbol of our nation? Both a question and an answer, with the last 200 pieces available. But there is a third medal, perhaps much more important in that regard, because thanks to the story of the Baťa brothers, it is a story of cooperation, brotherhood, love, enterprise, innovation, and, above all, a global story. Brothers who loved each other, but unfortunately, people only talk about Tomáš. Jan Antonín Baťa seems to have been excluded, pushed aside, and erased from our history. At the same time, he supported the Czechoslovak resistance, purchased aircraft, donated a huge amount of his personal gold to the Czechoslovak government, and did much more that is provable. We identify with his story, his vision, his industrial cities, and also with the Czechoslovak resistance and everything that Jan Antonín Baťa created. We are preparing documentation , books, materials, and other things that we will gradually introduce to you . We would be glad if you purchased a silver medal, as it supports all our activities; you can find a link here to purchase this silver medal. Thank you very much for your support, interest, background materials, sharing, and the potential purchase of one or perhaps even several coins. Thank you very much .